Imagine that a platform for compliance costing $12,000 annually. Does that sound like a high price?
What it replaces will decide the answer.
If you invest $12,000 to cut down on hundreds of hours of repetitive evidence gathering in an extremely complex technology environment, it could be money well invested. If a company of seven could have the same proof manually in a few minutes each month, the calculation looks considerably different.
It’s a good way to start the search for Vanta. Don’t begin by asking which platform offers the most features. Ask your company how these tools can help you save time and money.
Automation Can be a Break-Even Economic At this
It’s not necessarily either good or bad. The scale of the business can affect its value. Imagine a growing technology company that has multiple cloud environments and numerous applications. The manual process of gathering evidence can be a huge operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence can easily justify the expense.
Imagine a startup with 10 employees in preparation for their first SOC 2. The system may be compact, and the evidence collection could remain manageable without significant automation.
This is an important distinction to consider in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. While a well-developed platform can have many features however, they’re only useful for organizations that are required by the company.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. The two platforms are built on automation and integrated companies that are looking to adopt this method can benefit from having a look at the frameworks available with their integrations, service, as well as individual quotations and contracts.
There’s another choice to make first, however. Do you have a company that is interested in an integration-driven system for compliance? Some businesses prefer continuous monitoring and automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some companies prefer to produce their own evidence, especially when their workload is small.
Vanta Competitors do not follow the same model
Many Vanta competitors are in the same class that focuses on automation. There are also platforms with a lighter design which are focused more on system organization instead of connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter group. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It organizes framework controls into a single workspace that gives editable guidance on policies as well as evidence. Auditors are able to review the evidence submitted through a read-only interface.
It is deliberately not connected to operational systems or create infrastructure agents. Customers upload and choose the documents they would like to submit.
The system access should be considered. the access to the system.
Removal of integrations is not without its disadvantages: someone must take the time to collect evidence.
The application for compliance does not require integration and can be used without any standing connections with the operating environment.
Both architectures are equally excellent. It is important to ask which choices are best to your business.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams that have between five and 200 employees and gives pricing information rather than having to have a sales conversation. The price for its launch is $225 per month in contrast to a typical price of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
Today’s needs for a startup with a staff of 10 are not necessarily similar to the needs of a company with 100 or 500 employees.
A lighter platform can be beneficial while compliance stays simple. As the amount of systems, employees frameworks, evidence and requirements increases, economics may eventually favor greater automation. Let complexity play a role when buying compliance technologies.
Do not purchase fifty different integrations because they look impressive on the chart of comparison. Spend money on them if manually performing the work they replace becomes the more costly option.